Support Python in Cloud Functions
Support CPython 2.7 and CPython 3.6 in Cloud Functions
Grant Jenks
shared this idea
Changing status to “Planned” matching Morgan’s comment that it’s “on our radar.”
Note, users – if you’re interested in providing feedback on this item, please note his question in the comments about version support, and add your preferences and feedback via comments on this entry. Thanks!
24 comments
-
Eunice
commented
Please python 3.6!!!!
-
AlexHow
commented
Not bad
-
Anonymous
commented
Good idea,but please python 3.6
-
[Deleted User]
commented
Perhaps the title and description should be updated to say that it is now already available on GCP?
-
KnowEver
commented
really good idea
-
Jish
commented
I want see Python 3.6+
-
Chris Qvigstad
commented
Python 3.6+ would be good, no need for 2.7.
-
Alexander Fernández Anzardo
commented
Please Python 3.6+
-
Dave Viebrock
commented
I need support for python 3.6+. My team isn't doing anything in python 2x
-
Alexey Iskrov
commented
Please add a support for Python 3. I really hope for the support by the end of spring 2018.
-
Murtaza Kanchwala
commented
Looking for Python 3 support. Hope that we will get this by Apr-2018.
-
Anonymous
commented
Python native support is what I'm waiting for two years in a row!! I haven't use python versions below 3.5 for several years. For new projects 3.6+.
-
[Deleted User]
commented
Really excited about this.
Are there possibly any indications on what ********* timeframe might be and whether you'll have any Early Access Program?
-
Devin Bayer
commented
I think it's a much better idea to let users supply their own Python environment of whatever version they choose in the form of a docker image:
I know IBM Cloud supports this.
-
Brian
commented
Ditch python 2.7 (It's 2018 folks!), 3.6+ is where it's at.
-
Anonymous
commented
Is there a ballpark timeline for beta release / testing?
-
Sébastien Douche
commented
Good news! Don't forget that Python 2.7 will not be maintained past 2020, so I'm only interested in Python 3.
-
Theron Luhn
commented
I've been using Python 3 for all greenfield projects for the past several years, so I personally don't need 2.7. Most other Python developers I know are doing the same.
-
kasahara Seiji
commented
Great! Personally I don't need 2.7 support. Release earlier is much more important for me.
-
[Deleted User]
commented
3.6+ all the way. Async (*******) has completely changed the Python game and I can’t imagine even trying to use Python 2 on any meaningful cloud functions work.