Abdullah Al Azad

My feedback

  1. 844 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    73 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Paul Nash responded

    Hello folks,

    We are currently testing a new option that may help people send mail without using a third party service. If you are interested in testing this product, please fill out the interest request form here1. Product Management for the feature may reach out to you.

    We are also continuing to make improvements to our system to allow for some customers that have an established relationship with us to apply for an exception to be able to send directly on port 25. There are a number of IP reputation issues that have to be worked through for such a use case, so it should not be considered a common solution that will meet everyone’s needs.

    We will have more updates on both of these items over time.

    1 https://www.google.com/url?q=https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScg6ponYf4bc9HftBh4H4LypqpqKm3AS3bEJ20u_EfgTw59GQ/viewform&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1539107700687000&usg=AFQjCNFJ4f8dyp1OgCLUwjeLWoUKY1-Z6Q

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Abdullah Al Azad commented  · 

    Dear Google! this is how i feel about port block and restrictions. "I bought a brand new BMW car from their showroom but they delivered me a car without a engine. Now to use it i have to buy a engine separately" What is the point of $300 if We can't use their service completely without any restrictions and port block. By blocking ports we have to use other smtp relay service. That means unwanted expense. Please fix it.

Feedback and Knowledge Base