Dane MacMillan

My feedback

  1. 247 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    15 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dane MacMillan supported this idea  · 
  2. 422 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Dane MacMillan supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Paul Nash responded

    I’ve confirmed with the team that a few options along these lines are under investigation.

    Dane MacMillan shared this idea  · 
  4. 38 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under review  ·  Paul Nash responded

    We have generally not found scheduled autoscaling to be necessary in Google Cloud, unlike some other clouds. The technology behind our Load Balancers is the same as Google uses on all its sites, and we don’t need to do these types of tricks.

    We do get this request from time to time, but most customers find it is not needed, and several large web hosters have scrapped their own custom scheduling and pre-spinning approaches when migrating to GCP. Our instance provisioning and boot times are low enough that they work well for many use cases, and App Engine in particular is well suited to very fast and high scaling.

    The one thing we can’t affect would be if your particular application server requires a long time to configure itself at instance startup time. The best way to deal with that, at present, would be to try not to do…

    Dane MacMillan supported this idea  · 
  5. 118 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    planned  ·  Paul Nash responded

    This is something we are planning to improve, hopefully later in the year.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dane MacMillan commented  · 

    This would be great to have.

    Dane MacMillan supported this idea  · 
  6. 326 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Cloud Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Dane MacMillan commented  · 

    This is very necessary.

    Dane MacMillan supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base