Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Current design forces more complicated scripts -- loop thru zones. Please consider this feature improvement.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 232 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  14 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 40 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Load Balancing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 2,350 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    126 comments  ·  Load Balancing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    started  ·  Paul Nash responded

    We appreciate all of your feedback on how critical the HTTPHTTPS redirect feature is to your GCP apps. Our networking team has further increased the priority of this feature in our backlog based on your feedback and are aiming to deliver an Alpha in Q4, 2019.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Can't use your LB without it :(

  5. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Cloud Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 48 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Cloud Storage  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree. Too many hoops to jump through just to save files to a bucket.

  7. 514 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    36 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We’ve just released a feature to GA which allows you to detach and re-attach boot disks to GCE VMs.

    Using this feature, you may now restore a VM from snapshot by:

    1. Stopping the instance – (e.g. gcloud compute instances stop INSTANCE_NAME —zone INSTANCE_ZONE)

    2. Detaching the boot disk from the VM in question ($ gcloud compute instances detach-disk INSTANCE_NAME —disk DISK_NAME —zone INSTANCE_ZONE)

    2. Creating a disk from the snapshot in question

    3. Attaching the disk from step 2 to the VM as the boot disk ($ gcloud compute instances attach-disk INSTANCE_NAME —disk NEW_DISK_NAME —boot —zone INSTANCE_ZONE)

    After restore, the VM will keep its IP address and other properties (e.g. tags, labels, etc.).

    See more info about the feature in the docs:
    https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/disks/detach-reattach-boot-disk

    Down the road, we’re also planning to improve this flow to be “one-click easy.” More updates to come.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We should be able to copy snapshots to another project via the console.
    Why would you force users to the command line?
    Silly. Very silly.

  9. 432 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  6 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    It's nice that we can see CPU usage over time. But RAM is not available as an option to chart. Oddly, we have network packets. RAM is far more important for stability and health of the system.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base