Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Marketplace  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Interconnect  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous commented  · 

    To be more specific, if a VPN router is behind a NAT, the current documentation states that NAT traversal isn't possible with Cloud VPN. This has put us in a bind on more than one occasion.

    I would also request that the current VPN router documentation be expanded to other models, such as Meraki.

    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  3. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Compute Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Marketplace  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  5. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Marketplace  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base